Skip to main content

Eigenvector Centrality

SQL function: cugraph_eigenvector_centrality

Official cuGraph reference: C API

Score vertices by connections to other high-scoring vertices, using power iteration to find the dominant eigenvector.

Signature

cugraph_eigenvector_centrality(table_name [, src_col, dst_col [, weight_col [, options_json]]])

Relation inputs

The first positional argument names a registered edge table or view (the edges role). Parenthesized relation subqueries are not accepted; metadata validation uses the same registered name.

Vertex ID types

The edges relation declares the accepted vertex-ID domains. Numeric calls preserve the existing numeric schema. When logical string support is declared, Utf8, LargeUtf8, and Utf8View endpoint columns share one logical domain; their vertex-identity outputs are canonicalized to Utf8.

DomainAccepted endpoint inputsOutput contract
Numeric edge endpointsInt32, Int64The numeric output schema is used for numeric calls.
Logical string edge endpointsUtf8, LargeUtf8, Utf8ViewVertex identity columns are canonicalized to Utf8; scores, distances, counts, coordinates, and opaque labels remain numeric.

The native mapping type is Int64. Call-specific output schemas come from gpu_validate_call.

Logical string side-input limitations:

  • edge ID columns and edge-ID predicate side inputs are not supported for logical string graphs

Scalar arguments & JSON options

Positional scalar arguments

src_col and dst_col name the edge endpoint columns; both are optional and default to src and dst.

ArgumentTypeRequiredDefaultNotes
weight_colUtf8|nullnoaccepted as an edge-column binding; native algorithm execution does not consume weights; semantic effect: none for this algorithm

JSON options

OptionTypeDefaultConstraintsDescription
epsilonFloat640.000001> 0
max_iterationsUInt32200min 1

Graph construction options

Graph construction follows the shared defaults (directed=true, renumbering, python_cugraph policy) documented in Graph Construction Options.

Output schema

ColumnTypeNullableDescription
vertexInt64|Utf8noVertex receiving the eigenvector centrality score.
valueFloat64noEigenvector centrality score for the vertex.

These are generic descriptor schemas; validate the call to get the concrete, table-specific output schema.

Examples

These examples run on the citation network demo dataset.

The recursive core of the literature

Eigenvector centrality has no damping and no teleport: a paper scores highly only if the papers citing it score highly themselves. On 45.6M citation edges the fixed point concentrates all mass in the most self-reinforcing corner of the graph — the 1970s theory and databases canon:

SELECT p.title, p.year, ROUND(e.value, 3) AS eigenvector
FROM cugraph_eigenvector_centrality('citation_edges', 'src', 'dst') e
JOIN papers p ON p.paper_id = e.vertex
ORDER BY e.value DESC
LIMIT 6;
titleyeareigenvector
A relational model of data for large shared data banks19700.351
The Design and Analysis of Computer Algorithms19740.244
The complexity of theorem-proving procedures19710.171
Further Normalization of the Data Base Relational Model19720.153
New Directions in Cryptography19760.146
Reducibility Among Combinatorial Problems20100.129

The relational data model, the classic algorithms textbook, the founding NP-completeness results, and the paper that introduced public-key cryptography (the 2010 year on the last row is a reprint edition in the corpus). Compare with the PageRank example, whose damping spreads importance much further out.

Quantify the winner-take-all behavior

Both functions return plain relations, so one statement can measure how much more concentrated eigenvector mass is than PageRank mass — here, the top 100 of 4.1M scored papers hold 10.7% of all eigenvector centrality but only 2.8% of all PageRank:

WITH eig AS (
SELECT value, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY value DESC) AS rn
FROM cugraph_eigenvector_centrality('citation_edges', 'src', 'dst')),
pr AS (
SELECT value, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY value DESC) AS rn
FROM cugraph_pagerank('citation_edges', 'src', 'dst'))
SELECT
ROUND(100.0 * (SELECT SUM(value) FROM eig WHERE rn <= 100)
/ (SELECT SUM(value) FROM eig), 1) AS eigenvector_top100_pct,
ROUND(100.0 * (SELECT SUM(value) FROM pr WHERE rn <= 100)
/ (SELECT SUM(value) FROM pr), 1) AS pagerank_top100_pct;
eigenvector_top100_pctpagerank_top100_pct
10.72.8

If a ranking should reward being cited by the canon, this concentration is the point; if it should surface important work across eras and fields, prefer PageRank or Katz.

Limitations & lifecycle

No algorithm-specific limitations.

Validate before running

Dry-run validation checks registered relation metadata, column presence, static dtypes, and options only; it does not scan edge data, construct a graph, or prove source-vertex existence:

SELECT * FROM gpu_validate_call(
'cugraph_eigenvector_centrality',
'{"schema_version":1,"relations":{"edges":{"table":"target_edges"}},"options":{"src_col":"src","dst_col":"dst"}}'
);

See GPU Function Catalog API for the full gpu_validate_call contract.